India Needs More Teachers, Better Teachers

If teachers aren’t focused on guiding students to learn and gain knowledge, the fight against educational inequity won’t progress.

In the last couple of years, India has witnessed an educational revolution. Numerous social enterprises and NGOs have sprouted up, claiming to combat educational inequity in India—basically, the lack of opportunities for a certain strata of students to realize their potential and develop their creativity. As a teacher of fourth grade in a low-income government school in New Delhi, I have had the privilege of interacting with many education entrepreneurs and educators in India, and the consensus is that inequity is one of the most important educational issues to resolve. Entrepreneurs, activists, and policy makers have been searching for concrete solutions, but few take in the complexity of the situation. Addressing inequity requires that we consider all aspects of the educational system, including curriculum development, technology, school infrastructure, and teacher training. Targeting just one of these aspects in isolation will not solve the problem.

A grade 4 classroom in Delhi, India. (Photo by Devanik Saha)

Several issues that contribute to educational inequity have been ignored for years. Two problems are access to affordable schooling and appropriate textbooks. There have been many attempts to resolve these problems. The Azim Premji Foundation plans to open 1,300 new schools across various districts of India. The nonprofit Pratham Books provides low-cost books. The Indian government launched the low-cost Aakash tablet. But while these efforts are highly commendable, they don’t address another, more fundamental problem: India needs more and better teachers. Until teachers effectively impart knowledge to students in their class, these initiatives will not fully achieve their missions of improving education inequity in India.

Part of the problem is absenteeism. According to a World Bank and Harvard University study, 1 out of 4 teachers in India are absent on any given day—an average 25 percent absenteeism rate, ranging from 15 percent in Maharashtra to 42 percent in Jharkhand, with higher rates concentrated in the poorer states. The absenteeism rate at my school is lower than average, but still, 6 out of 8 teachers aren’t present in their classrooms. If a teacher is absent, the students just play in the classroom; their school time is totally wasted.

There’s also the issue of teacher effectiveness. At the helm of every initiative and resource lies the teacher. I like to use the learning theory of constructivism to define an effective teacher. A constructivist teacher provides a classroom environment for exploration, thinking, reflection, and interaction; they play the role of facilitator, helping students become expert learners. The teacher designs the learning environment to support and challenge the student's thinking, and takes the initiative to steer the learning experience to where the students want to create value. Using this process, teacher-facilitators nurture critical and independent thinkers in the classroom.

The fact is that no matter how many resources a teacher has at their disposal, if they aren’t focused on guiding students to learn and gain knowledge, the fight against educational inequity won’t progress. If a baseball player gets impressive sponsorships but isn’t interested to go to the ground and bat, the team can’t win. Similarly, if a teacher has a school and books, but isn’t interested in leveraging the resources (or isn’t able to), then there is absolutely no point in investing in developing those resources.

New social enterprises, government, civil society, and nonprofits need to focus on creating a teaching ecosystem within the educational system of India where constructivist teachers are fostered. That may mean creating initiatives that improve teacher compensation, enrolling more teachers, or motivating talented youth to take up teaching. With the implementation of the Right To Education (RTE) act, which mandates compulsory education for children aged 14 and younger, the importance of fostering committed teachers is more important than ever.

Tracker Pixel for Entry


  • very romantic but i think people like mr.Saha are only making a mess of things by repeatedly highlighting ‘poor’ and ‘unfathomably’ discriminant education system in India. These misguided neo-social reformists in the garb of social change are sensationalizing an issue instead of finding a solution. wads and wads are written and published and broadcasting about the Indian education system .  people and even government is terminally bored and fed up with this kind of hogwash.

    How long and how far can you attract bright teachers using pathos?  Low cost books and facilities are obtainable IF there are teachers.

    Where are the motivated teachers ? is it how you motivate teachers ? Making them guilty? The whole article looks like a supporting transcript.

  • I think whats needed to reform education in India is NOT VOLUNTEERS. We have millions of volunteers who are NOT qualified as teachers. What smart people like Mr.Saha should do is to attempt to raise funds and enroll bright and enthusiastic teachers and create a reward mechanism .  This will have two benefits.  Kids get GOOD education ( because there are GOOD teachers). Teachers get motivated. because there is a due process followed in selection, motivation and reward. 

    Simply painting sad pictures and narrating sob stories make people run away and will ultimately be counter productive.

  • Radhika C's avatar

    BY Radhika C

    ON September 19, 2012 12:08 AM

    Mr. Ravi, I don’t think Mr. Saha’s motive was to make anybody feel guilty.
    It’s not about how sad the story is,  it’s a reality check.
    Have you entered a classroom? Have you seen how certain teachers are not taking their kids education seriously? (No offence to any teacher though)
    The kids depend upon such teachers for all that they’re gonna know. They depend on them for their futures. It has to be taken seriously.
    But it is a sob story. Motivated teachers are already there, teaching at such schools. Why can’t we notice a difference? Because the number of such motivated teachers can be counted on your fingers.
    And I know, Volunteers are not qualified as teachers, but that is why they are volunteers. They do not have the qualification, but they do have the willingness to put up a little effort and change things, as much as they can.

    How is one supposed to go through such selection-motivation-reward processes where they can’t even afford one book for each individual student. Where kids sit on floors and study because the furniture is not affordable.
    Mr. Saha’s motive was just to make people realize what actually is going on and what changes we need to go through, to make all of this a better place.

  • Mr Saha…Azim Premji Foundation has not opened 1,300 new schools across various districts of India. This is a wrong information. It is planning to open schools and has opened only 4-5 schools till now.

Leave a Comment


Please enter the word you see in the image below:


SSIR reserves the right to remove comments it deems offensive or inappropriate.

Helping Children Succeed: What Works and Why

By Paul Tough

Building on his previous work about the importance of personal traits such as perseverance in student success, Paul Tough focuses Helping Children Succeed on how educators, policymakers, and parents can help children develop those attributes.