Philanthropy & Funding

Sponsoring Hope

A properly designed sponsor-a-child program can have real, long-term impact on the life course of its beneficiaries.


A study of one child sponsorship organization shows that the sponsor model can yield positive long-term results. (Image courtesy of Compassion International) 

A young couple in Uganda, when asked if they would like to enter their newborn into a child sponsorship program—a program similar to the one that helped both of them get through school and into good jobs—said no. “Poverty ended with us,” they explained.

International child sponsorship programs collectively raise more than $3 billion per year. Those photos of developing world kids that get pasted to so many refrigerator doors in the developed world clearly help large aid organizations to raise funds. But do the the kids actually benefit from the money donated? Some researchers have now tracked many of these children into adulthood, and the answer—at least for one child sponsorship organization—is yes. “The impacts that we find on secondary school completion and on employment are fairly remarkable,” says Bruce Wydick, a professor of economics and international studies at the University of San Francisco. “We did the study in six countries, and in all six countries we find positive impacts from sponsorship.”

Wydick and colleagues followed more than 10,000 adults in Bolivia, Guatemala, India, Kenya, the Philippines, and Uganda. The adults who had received charitable sponsorship as children are one-third more likely to have finished high school, and on average they complete more than a year of additional education. They are also 35 percent more likely to have a white-collar job.

“It’s probably the impact evaluation that most changed my mind about things,” says David McKenzie, lead economist in the World Bank’s research department. The impact in this case is especially notable, he says, “given the lack of results of many other development interventions that have been darlings of the aid world.”

The results of this study don’t necessarily apply to all child sponsorship programs. Wydick and his colleagues contacted many sponsorship organizations, but only one—Compassion International—was willing to participate in the study. Compassion International is a child-focused church-based organization that follows a pure sponsorship model: Instead of using sponsor donations to build village-level public goods like a road or a school, it directs benefits to individual children. Compassion, moreover, attends not only to children’s need for meals, immunizations, and tutoring support, but also to their emotional, spiritual, and social development. In that way, the Compassion program instills a sense of hope.

And hope, as Wydick has discovered in follow-up studies, may be crucial to the program’s positive outcomes. “If you only gave hope to kids without giving them some basis for hope, that probably wouldn’t work very well,” he says. “But if you only did things like provide school tuition and uniforms for kids, without increasing the level of aspirations, they might not believe that they’re actually capable of greater levels of education and better employment than their parents.”

The Compassion program is relatively expensive, but it has a lasting impact—especially on certain groups of people. “If you want to do a really good thing in the world, sponsor a girl in sub-Saharan Africa through an organization that uses a pure sponsorship model,” says Wydick. “And if you want to do something great in the world, sponsor 10 [girls].”

Bruce Wydick, Paul Glewwe, and Laine Rutledge, “Does International Child Sponsorship Work? A Six-Country Study of Impacts on Adult Life Outcomes,” Journal of Political Economy, 121, 2013.

Tracker Pixel for Entry


  • BY Paul Penley

    ON September 5, 2013 12:19 PM

    Compassion’s strict program guidelines, leadership development and internal accountability are paying off. As a charity evaluator myself, I’ve been impressed at success on such a large scale. To see Compassion’s growth rate, # of children served, total expenses and fundraising efficiency, go to

  • Great to see you comment here, Paul, and what a timely article as I just learned of Compassion’s new Change the Story project which is a mobile experience that helps those who cannot or won’t travel to developing contexts the ability to get a better sense for, and internalize, the situation in a way that leads to action.

  • Wayne F Hess's avatar

    BY Wayne F Hess

    ON September 5, 2013 02:31 PM

    A great article and I can attest to the effectiveness of a sponsorship program.

    I have been working with a school sponsorship program for the past twelve years. The program was started by Casa Xelaju, a Spanish language school in Guatemala, about eighteen years ago..I founded La Pedrera School Project, a 501 (c) 3, organization to facilitate the recruitment of volunteer sponsors. At the time the program started in Guatemala, no child had made it past the fourth grade. There have now been twenty two high school graduates and one young lady graduated from university as a nurse
    The website for the project is:

  • BY Jennifer Lentfer

    ON September 6, 2013 07:08 AM

    Regardless of the results of this particular impact study, the author would have brought more balance to the topic by at least highlighting the ethical issues that can occur within child sponsorship schemes, that is their potential to disrupt community cohesion and create local inequalities, the psychological effects of being an aid recipient, and the amount of funds spent on administration of the communications between donor and child that does not go into programs. I agree with the evaluators’ conjecture that hope is instilled through a mix of tangible and intangible results, but so much of the success of child sponsorship programs has to do with the skills and management of those on the ground and the relationships they create with the children’s families and communities.

    For a collection of articles examining the ethical aspects of child sponsorship, see:

  • Tania DoCarmo's avatar

    BY Tania DoCarmo

    ON September 6, 2013 11:34 PM

    Thank you, Jennifer. I’m often surprised at the lack of conversation in articles such as this one (and many others) about these same ethical concerns. Many of my colleagues and I (I work for an international non-profit) are very concerned with the long-term impact of singling out children in this way and the potential for exploitation.

  • BY Help my study

    ON July 15, 2014 03:04 AM

    Although, many organization working to help underprivileged child on their study, due to their operating cost the axact amount of donation is been expensing on unrelated matter. The matter that focus by some organization to collect more funds and spend less make many donors confused while choosing the right organization. There are millions of childrens deprived from basic needs in the world. In developing country like Nepal thousand of childs haven’t seen even a primary school yet. As a organization which helps to provide equal education oppertunity to the child from underprivileged communities, we suggest on contributing small amount that can change the life of someone.

    we have no idea how our $10 can change the life of someone. But this$10 can contribute to buy book for the whole year for one child. What a wondorous world is this, some possess fountain in the thirsty city but some are dying of thirst and we pepole have no concern about contributing an small drops. Just have a glimpse of the child seeking sponsor to have primary school educaton on our organizaiton

    Any way I appreciate your contribution on this post.

  • BY George Onyango

    ON February 9, 2015 01:16 PM

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    Dandora Dumpsite Rehabilitation Group (DADREG), is seeking help on behalf of one of the girls we have supported with education in primary school. The girl once lived in the streets and scavenging in the dumpsite. Though sports, we were able to get her back to school.

    In 2014, she performed well in her national examination getting 356 marks out of 500 marks. She was admitted in one of the best girls’ school, Loreto Girls High School. However, because of poverty, she not been able to report, even though they were to report on 2nd of February 2015. The girl is desperately in need and would like to continue with her education so that she will one day rescue her mother from the streets.

    The girl need US$1,200 fees for the whole year. The fees includes boarding, tuition, uniforms, text books, shoes, medical and her shopping that includes soaps, toiletry, tooth paste, tooth brash and many others. We would not mind if she would get support to help her attend school for the first 2 terms.

    For a girl, this is a very good achievement more so if she happens to come from poor families that are faced with challenges in life like going hungry and having no place to sleep. It is against this reason that if she is not helped, she might opt to engage in antisocial activities or get married at very tender age.

    We would be happy for any support so that we talk to the school she is admitted to, to preserve the space for her.

    For more information about our work, visit:

    Any support to help this girl go to high school will be highly appreciated.

    Yours sincerely

    George Onyango

Leave a Comment


Please enter the word you see in the image below:


SSIR reserves the right to remove comments it deems offensive or inappropriate.
If We Want Our Funding to Change the World… - Thumbnail
Philanthropy & Funding

If We Want Our Funding to Change the World…

Featuring Donors Forum

Grantmakers and nonprofit leaders at the Donors Forum—an annual convening in Illinois to advance social change institutions—discuss the real cost of running an effective nonprofit and why it is essential for grantmakers to support indirect costs.

Great Management Creates Great Impact - Thumbnail
Philanthropy & Funding

Great Management Creates Great Impact

Featuring Josh Beckenstein

Philanthropist Josh Bekenstein of Bain Capital explains how philanthropists unwilling to cover nonprofits’ indirect or overhead costs are missing the opportunity to completely support that organization’s mission.