If you're feeling like an idiot trying to navigate the technologies and data that increasingly shape nonprofits' operations and strategies, Alix Dunn with Computer Says Maybe and the Stanford PACS Digital Civil Society Lab has a message for you: you're not.
Technology is just hard, Dunn said in her presentation that opened the 2019 Data on Purpose: Navigating the Digital Now conference. Especially today, when tech is changing at a pace faster than ever that can snare unprepared organizations in a grueling game of catch-up.
Dunn's solutions to the dilemmas of the digital now were some of many offered by scholars and practitioners who gathered for the two-day conference. For more highlights from the presentations that SSIR editors and others shared on Twitter using the #SSIRdata hashtag, as well as links to related materials, read on.
Skip to a Session Recap
Are you enjoying this article? Read more like this, plus SSIR's full archive of content, when you subscribe.
2. Is Your Data Undermining Your Mission?
3. Data Capacity-Building in the Civic Sector
4. Which Solution is the Right One? The Product Approach to Sustainable Impact
5. Unlocking Existing Data to Create New Solutions Through a Data Trust Collaborative
6. Building Better Blockchain Technology: The Blockchain Ethical Design Framework
7. Facing the Facts: Security and Privacy and IoT
8. Algorithms and Social Spaces
9. The Transformative Power of Predictive Analytics
10. Meet the 2017 Digital Impact Grantees
11. Closing Keynote: The Viral Versus the Vital
Session 1: Technical Intuition
How do activists avoid feeling inadequate in discussions with tech experts? Which tools do you adopt first? Which do you let go?
In a world where the pace of organizational learning is often slower than the pace of technological change, the answers to such questions can be found by developing your technical intuition ("T.int"), Dunn said. She described it as an ongoing process to imagine, inquire about, decide, and demand technological change.
.@alixtrot introducing 'technical intuition' at #SSIRdata – starting with the Gartner hype cycle for emerging technologies: https://t.co/1jDURmlf0l
— Zara Rahman (@zararah) February 19, 2019
If you want to level up your "T.int," keep these guidelines in mind: start with concepts; build conceptual scaffolding; don’t delegate curiosity; balance the inner critic and enthusiast; experiment, but choose.
Thanks so much to the @SSIReview and #SSIRData crew!
— Alix (@alixtrot) February 21, 2019
If you’re interested in the slides from my presentation on technical intuition you can find them here:https://t.co/lEdAbZuTEc
Dunn also suggested that technology experts recognize that they "terrify people" and warned organizations away from delegating decision-making about technology to just young people.
Dive Deeper:
- Listen to a podcast from our 2018 Data on Purpose conference. Dunn, along with Lucy Bernholz, a senior research scholar at Stanford’s Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society and the director of the Digital Civil Society Lab, and Amy O’Donnell, the information communications technology program lead at Oxfam, discuss how civil society organizations can examine their data governance practices to align with the demands of governments, their constituents, and their mission.
Session 2: Is Your Data Undermining Your Mission?
If you work in the social good sector, you can’t ignore the history of people with power collecting and using data from people without power. What is the responsible way to handle information?
A big problem with finding the answer is that people commonly think data will both destroy and save them, said presenter Rahul Bhargava, data scientist with the MIT Media Lab. However, in an SSIR Twitter poll (with a debatable methodology), respondents seemed optimistic about the information flood:
"Inflated expectations and disillusionment happen at the same time."
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 19, 2019
Are you optimistic or pessimistic about data as a tool for good in the world? @rahulbot with @civicMIT starts the second session of #ssirdata with a question for the audience.
Had SSIR's editors provided a "both optimistic and pessimistic" option, it’s more likely the quick survey would have directly echoed Bhargava's point that exaggerated hopes and fears make it difficult to "align data with mission."
When it comes time to do an organizational data health check, Bhargava suggested closely tracking these concerns: lack of transparency, extractive collection, technical complexity, and decisions about who controls the impact of the data. The analysis isn't so much about expertise as it is about how your organization thinks about the challenges.
"You don't need a data scientist," Bhargava said, echoing elements of Dunn's presentation that decried the fetishization of technical expertise. "You need a data culture."
Excel doesn't help you ask the right question. Tableau won't help you figure out which story to tell. R won't tell you which chart to choose to speak to your audience. You need to work on your data culture, not just your technical tool tricking. —@rahulbot #SSIRdata
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 19, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Read SSIR articles from Bhargava: "Telling Your Data Story Well" and "Architecting for Data."
- Read an SSIR article about digital translators who can help build the bridges between data, technology, and doing good.
Session 3: Data Capacity-Building in the Civic Sector
What can help the social sector go big on data in the right ways? For one, it should stop underestimating itself, said panelist Aman Ahuja, a data consultant:
It may not be feasible for every organization to have a dedicated in-house data analyst, @kpettitdc says. Yet, @AmanQA notes, "organizations often underestimate what they’re capable of doing" without specialists. #SSIRdata
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 19, 2019
Other members of the panel included moderator Kevin Miller, civic technology manager from the Microsoft Cities Team, and Kathryn Pettit, principal research associate at The Urban Institute. A third speaker, Kauser Razvi, principal of Strategic Urban Solution, noted that different communities are at different stages of data fluency:
Technological capacity is hyperlocal, says @ksrazvi. We think of data as a ubiquitous tool, but that’s not accurate. Some sectors may be better equipped than others to collect, manage, and analyze data. Surveys can help understand different communities' capacities. #SSIRdata
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 19, 2019
The panel also discussed concerns around organizations building their data strategy around funding opportunities or cost, not deeper strategic goals. As Razvi said, "There’s a high cost to free sometimes." And consistent with the previous two sessions, the panel emphasized culture over technical expertise:
Scaling up the social sector's data capacity needs a champion every level, be that a school district, state government, or national network. “That person doesn’t have to be a technologist" but they need to understand how data can help solve social problems. —@KSRazvi #SSIRdata
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 19, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- How can social change organizations catch up with their counterparts in the scientific and business communities in collecting and analyzing the vast amounts of data that are being generated by digital technology? This article from the Summer 2014 issue of SSIR offers four steps to help: "Big Data for Social Innovation."
Session 4: Which Solution is the Right One? The Product Approach to Sustainable Impact
How can nonprofits assess their data and technology investments before committing to them? At Vulcan Inc., which guides the organizations and initiatives of the late philanthropist and Microsoft cofounder Paul G. Allen, the team takes steps that include examining the level of impact, the difficulty of the problem, the risks of execution, and potential business models. Art Min, Vulcan's vice president of impact, and Chris Emura, the firm's executive director for engineering, went on to describe projects such as EarthRanger, Allen Coral Atlas, and Skylight.
"While technology and data is necessary, it's by no means sufficient. Traditional philanthropy like grant making and community building is critical. Creating impact is a numbers game -- we believe tech can improve and increase the "shots on goal"" - @artmin #SSIRData pic.twitter.com/BBtJTIgg2Z
— Vulcan Inc. (@VulcanInc) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Profile of Vulcan by Inside Philanthropy: "Inside Vulcan, a New Model for Solving Some of the World’s Biggest Problems."
- Explore the characteristics of nonprofits succeeding with digital projects in this SSIR article from February 2018: "What Makes Nonprofit Digital Teams Successful Today?"
Session 5: Unlocking Existing Data to Create New Solutions Through a Data Trust Collaborative
So you want to combine your data with another organization's. You think it could help achieve individual and collective goals. But how do you do it and will it live up to its promise?
In a session moderated by Rob Hope of the San Francisco Foundation, conference attendees heard from Stephen Bediako with Path Group, and Matt Gee with BrightHive. They talked about Project Signal, an emerging data trust collaborative in California that is taking on the state's challenges around employment and job training.
When it comes to figuring out where to start, consider a specific region or specific sector to increase your chances of success, the panel suggested. Also be attuned to social shifts that may make your data collaboration the most effective. The panelists identified extraordinary wealth inequality in the state and the new governor's support of data use as indicators that the time was now to think about using data for good.
The time is now to demonstrate how data can be used for good and to support people, not just to make a profit. —@pathgroupinc’s @stephentsip on the promise of data trusts like Project Signal in California #SSIRdata
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Three tips on successfully sharing data in a June 2017 SSIR article: "Using Collaboration to Harness Big Data for Social Good."
Session 6: Building Better Blockchain Technology: The Blockchain Ethical Design Framework
Cara LaPointe, senior fellow at the Beeck Center for Social Impact and Innovation at Georgetown University, made it clear that technology is just a tool serving an end, and one that must be handled carefully to manage the values embedded within it.
Blockchain can help with everything from identity for refugee or homeless populations to conflict diamonds, she said, but it is still human beings who design and run it. She shared three concepts to interrogate to ensure a technology is ethically made: outcomes, users, and orientation.
What's an ethical design framework for #blockchain? Cara LaPointe of @BeeckCenter lays it out: https://t.co/p97VX226Dd #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/Td3V7jBxbT
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
If you're wondering if blockchain is for you, LaPointe provided a sampling of questions from the "Blockchain Ethical Design Framework" she coauthored with Lara Fishbane:
If you answer yes to a lot of these questions, then #blockchain might work for you, says Cara LaPointe of @BeeckCenter. Find the full framework here: https://t.co/p97VX226Dd #SSIRData pic.twitter.com/OcVRFnJ5xv
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Blockchain, the technology at the heart of bitcoin and other digital currencies, may have the potential to drive profound social impact and transform the social sector along the way. Read the SSIR article "Digital Currencies and Blockchain in the Social Sector."
- By making data easily verifiable, resistant to alteration, and instantly available to anyone within a network, the incorruptible digital ledgers known as blockchains can help ensure that commercial goods are ethically produced from mine to store. Read the January 2019 SSIR article "How Blockchain Can Make Supply Chains More Humane."
- Blockchain technology will not solve all government problems, but it can help curb corruption and instill trust in government. Read the March 2018 SSIR article "Will Blockchain Disrupt Government Corruption?"
Session 7: Facing the Facts: Security and Privacy and IoT
Smart products like thermostats, digital personal assistants, and fitness trackers can help us organize our lives, homes, and work teams. Yet many of these devices are rushed to market with little consideration for basic data security and privacy protections. The risks range from merely creepy to major safety threats for individuals and national infrastructure.
Jeff Wilbur, technical director at the Internet Society, offered an overview of what’s driving the lack of security and privacy in many Internet of Things (IoT) products, and described efforts to improve safety and consumer awareness.
Smart TVs, thermostats, and other #IoT devices are coming in under the radar at an accelerated pace. Nonprofits must understand the risks. —@jeffwilbur01 of @internetsociety #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/slFmI5TzFr
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Wilbur shared a “trust framework” from his organization’s Online Trust Alliance initiative to help consumers, businesses, and governments adopt responsible IoT practices.
How to address concerns about #IoT? @jeffwilbur01 of @internetsociety says to focus on all dimensions: the entire system (devices, sensors, apps, platforms & web services) and all consumer concerns (security, privacy & lifecycle). More details: https://t.co/TZ6cuwUKe2 #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/WTAuviqgil
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Read an SSIR article from 2015 about several ventures in developing countries showing how networks of connected machines can drive economic growth.
Session 8: Algorithms and Social Spaces
Computational algorithms, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly being deployed by civil society organizations and others . Mimi Onuhoa and Diana Nucera wrote A People’s Guide to AI as a beginner's guide to understanding AI and the cultural effects of algorithms. They led a workshop to demonstrate how algorithms in social spaces can exclude and prioritize certain people, and what algorithmic accountability can look like in practice.
Onuhoa and Necera began by asking the audience what they think of when they hear the term AI.
When you think about #AI, what comes to mind? Some answers from the #SSIRdata audience: "Bladerunner." "A lot of information." "Our future technology overlords." "Implicit bias." “Probably not for my organization.” —@mothercyborg and @thistimeitsmimi pic.twitter.com/b1NuLKoy0v
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
The audience then participated in an exercise to build an algorithm using publicly available data that would find the 10 most fun and interesting people at the conference to invite to a party.
Loved this analog #algorithm activity facilitated by @Allied_Media to demonstrate the limitations and #bias of #reductive proxy data. #ssirdata
— Maggie Cheung (@MagsOnFire) February 20, 2019
"Algorithms shouldn't be making decisions. People who are affected should be making those decisions." pic.twitter.com/vPb8qA8Jol
The exercise was a lesson in algorithms’ limitations. Of course, it's subjective to figure out what or who is fun and interesting. Data like how many Facebook followers you have, what restaurants you’ve reviewed on Yelp, and your employment and education history on LinkedIn tell just one part of the story. People may not have access to the internet and for that reason would be excluded automatically.
When examining #algorithms, the question is: Who do they fail to include? Making classifications always leaves someone out. So how do we make it the most equitable it can be? —@thistimeitsmimi @mothercyborg, authors of https://t.co/CIn4DbtDe9. #SSIRData pic.twitter.com/Dk6iWPqTox
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Read this SSIR article: “Artificial Intelligence as a Force for Good.”
- Listen to this podcast with AI expert Fei-Fei Li: “Fostering a Human-Centered Approach to Artificial Intelligence,” from Data on Purpose 2018.
- Read this SSIR article about the nonprofit AI4ALL, which leads summer programs for high schoolers to increase diversity in the AI field: "Developing a More Diverse AI."
Session 9: The Transformative Power of Predictive Analytics
Social sector organizations are developing methods of implementing predictive analytics to help address inequities in their work.
Parag Gupta, vice president of the Stupski Foundation, and Jeff Gold, assistant vice chancellor at California State University, shared a case study of how public higher education institutions are successfully using predictive analytics to increase graduation rates and close the achievement and opportunity gaps between low-income and underrepresented minority students and their peers.
California State University uses predictive #analytics to address the matriculation gap of its student body, explains Assistant Vice Chancellor Jeff Gold. Their model looks at a variety of indicators (e.g., 1st-year GPA & courses) and parses them by campuses and majors. #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/suU4KbRq2X
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Predictive analytics can help organizations iterate rapidly, become more transparent and precise, and may help pinpoint opportunities for cost savings. In 2018, Cal State graduation rates were the highest they’ve ever been while equity gaps also narrowed. Still, many disparities remain.
Using these data tools also has its challenges, Gupta outlined:
Challenges to using predictive #analytics in the social sector: requires data from the start (or time to collect it); systems can be deterministic (data might be used in punitive ways); and the cost and time involved with implementation. — @ParagGuptaSF #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/uCqGhymY7g
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
The first step to getting started is figuring out if leadership has bought in. “It’s less about the technology being the savior than having the leadership on board,” Gupta said.
Dive Deeper:
- Read a report from the Public Policy Institute of California on how the California State University system is using data to improve graduation rates and eliminate equity gaps.
Session 10: Meet the 2017 Digital Impact Grantees
The Digital Civil Society Lab at Stanford PACS runs the Digital Impact initiative to support digital infrastructure for civil society and help social sector practitioners and policymakers use digital resources safely, ethically, and effectively for maximum impact.
The 2017 cohort of Digital Impact grantees presented their projects, ranging from creating plain-language versions of laws for vulnerable communities to gamifying security training for human rights defenders.
Rachel Bernstein with @benetech describes gamifying human rights monitoring and security training to make it more effective. "We're really excited about the potential for this narrative game." #SSIRData #gamification pic.twitter.com/bWhxIo1a60
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Julie Broome, director of a Ariadne, a network of European funders supporting social change and human rights, discussed the need for a decision-making framework for how philanthropic organizations share and store grants data—and how that framework must involve grantees.
There's increasing pressure on philanthropy to be more transparent. At the same time, collecting and sharing data has risks. Funders and grantees need to regularly discuss concerns around storage and sharing, and make decisions together.— Julie Broome w/ @ariadnenetwork #SSIRData
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Session 11: Closing Keynote: The Viral Versus the Vital
As co-founder of #GivingTuesday, Henry Timms has thought a lot about harnessing the energy of the digital world for positive change. Timms, the incoming president and CEO of Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, former president of 92Y, and coauthor of New Power, closed out the conference by challenging the audience members to consider their responsibilities as individuals, organizations, and a society in how they live their digital lives.
He presented a Hippocratic Oath for how we present ourselves digitally—a pledge to be kind, check sources for anything sensational, unplug once in a while, and even share the occasional cat pic.
“What should make up a hippocratic oath for how we present ourselves in the digital world?“ —@henrytimms at #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/OgneyW9LGh
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
The social sector has an immense opportunity to create digital communities that give people a meaningful role in our society—spaces where they can be heard and be part of a collective vision and narrative, Timms said.
“People want to be part of a larger mission and larger idea,” he said. “Every day we need to be doing things that are more participatory.”
Are social impact organizations creating our own piece of the world? Or are we inviting people to shape a collective future? "We need to move past the 'move fast and break things' philosophy and shift to 'move thoughtfully and improve things.'" —@henrytimms closing out #SSIRdata pic.twitter.com/1w2iCsT986
— Social Innovation (@SSIReview) February 20, 2019
Dive Deeper:
- Read a review of New Power from the Summer 2018 issue of SSIR.
- “The idea that technology and innovation are solely the province of new organizations is a myth.” Read an SSIR article in which Timms and Asha Curran, chief innovation officer and director of the Belfer Center for Innovation & Social Impact at 92Y, share their lessons on innovating within established organizations.
Support SSIR’s coverage of cross-sector solutions to global challenges.
Help us further the reach of innovative ideas. Donate today.
Read more stories by Eden Stiffman & M. Amedeo Tumolillo.