Iowa did not receive a RTT grant and I’m unsure (based on what I read in the paper) that IA will reapply in the second round - something about not wanting to enter into talks with the local teachers’ union over issues of school reform, and the teachers’ bug-a-boo, hooking pay to performance, topics which you don’t discuss. I can’t imagine that states would demur over the four criteria articulated above, but I have a couple comments. The link between standards and assessment: The listing of knowledge, skills and attitudes that kids should know and be able to do is lengthy, much more so than our narrow, math & reading assessment tools (those that yield the metrics that we read in the news). I would prefer that my grandchildren have a broad, liberal education, even though the standardized tests don’t yield a measure of “civility,” let’s say. And, the idea that awards should go to schools (states) that are already implementing the criteria and showing progress seems to be like giving the tax breaks to the rich. There’s little trickle down.
The interview helped me better understand a complicated issue.
Obama/Duncan’s Well-Intentioned ‘Race to the Top’ Leaves Only Teachers Behind
There are some great teachers, and even some great Teacher Preparation programs, but these are random occurrences where consistency is essential. The reason is simple: Professional Education is missing fundamental standards found in all other professions. There is no standard curriculum, no sincere effort to identify Best Instructional Practices, and truckloads of weak consultants and players with diluted degrees serving up their own brands of Faculty Development. To be called a profession it is imperative that a profession, one way or another, needs to convene a rolling forum to collect and prioritize the core content of principles and practices that every member ought to know. Ironically, Teachers worldwide are being held to standards for annual yearly progress of their students. Meanwhile, Professors, Learned Societies & commercial schools, and some painfully self-serving non-profit foundations and Universities never even address the need for solid pedagogic content. Worse, those that do publish material under titles referencing Best Practices are quite simply hype, if not fraudulent. The current crop of in-charge “Leaders” dangerously resembles the Investment Bankers who remain in charge of the economic systems that they nearly bankrupted. Perhaps the only way to expose and reform this systemic disaster would be a class action by teachers &/or parents & students against all of us who have been complicit in these myriad layers of self-interest actions bordering on malpractice.
Since the likelihood of legal action is a remote it would be wonderfully unprecedented for a leveraged agency, such as the US Department of Education to hold a convention of the nation’s leading educators to consider and ideally endorse a covenant of principles and more importantly prescriptive practices ideally on a website that transparently allows these to be challenged, tweaked and further specified for different age-grade-situational conditions. Additionally, such a rolling convention also could address differentiated staffing based on what schools are expected to do, and with a differentiated set of Best Practices for each function, like doctors and nurses, attorneys and paralegals, etc. Schools are expected to carry-on three essential although overlapping functions: 1. Teach new concepts, content and a positive disposition toward self-directed learning; 2. Provide assessment and supervised practice in these objectives; and, 3. Operate a massive custodial role that keeps students in school for at least seven-nine hours a day for about 200 days a year for about 13 years, and now through at least 2 more years of college. Our labor market and economic system depend on schools to meet these criteria at the very least. The problem is not the expectations, but that staffing, and organization do not reflect these three societal essentials. And, sadly there is no free market in which to buy the best ideas and practices. But, this is another complex issue requiring several additional paragraphs that would not begin and end with vouchers and charter schools.
Meanwhile, please consider joining the websites below offering a potentially startup means of getting the current system moving in the right direction for all who would teach. As an aside, taxpayers would be grateful since increasing classroom effectiveness and adding differentiated staffing could bring about efficiencies that could save billions of dollars with even the smallest degree of adoption.
Anthony V. Manzo, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus,
University of Missouri-KC
COMMENTS
BY Gerald Ott
ON April 9, 2010 08:16 AM
Iowa did not receive a RTT grant and I’m unsure (based on what I read in the paper) that IA will reapply in the second round - something about not wanting to enter into talks with the local teachers’ union over issues of school reform, and the teachers’ bug-a-boo, hooking pay to performance, topics which you don’t discuss. I can’t imagine that states would demur over the four criteria articulated above, but I have a couple comments. The link between standards and assessment: The listing of knowledge, skills and attitudes that kids should know and be able to do is lengthy, much more so than our narrow, math & reading assessment tools (those that yield the metrics that we read in the news). I would prefer that my grandchildren have a broad, liberal education, even though the standardized tests don’t yield a measure of “civility,” let’s say. And, the idea that awards should go to schools (states) that are already implementing the criteria and showing progress seems to be like giving the tax breaks to the rich. There’s little trickle down.
The interview helped me better understand a complicated issue.
BY Anthony V. Manzo
ON May 3, 2010 11:46 AM
Obama/Duncan’s Well-Intentioned ‘Race to the Top’ Leaves Only Teachers Behind
There are some great teachers, and even some great Teacher Preparation programs, but these are random occurrences where consistency is essential. The reason is simple: Professional Education is missing fundamental standards found in all other professions. There is no standard curriculum, no sincere effort to identify Best Instructional Practices, and truckloads of weak consultants and players with diluted degrees serving up their own brands of Faculty Development. To be called a profession it is imperative that a profession, one way or another, needs to convene a rolling forum to collect and prioritize the core content of principles and practices that every member ought to know. Ironically, Teachers worldwide are being held to standards for annual yearly progress of their students. Meanwhile, Professors, Learned Societies & commercial schools, and some painfully self-serving non-profit foundations and Universities never even address the need for solid pedagogic content. Worse, those that do publish material under titles referencing Best Practices are quite simply hype, if not fraudulent. The current crop of in-charge “Leaders” dangerously resembles the Investment Bankers who remain in charge of the economic systems that they nearly bankrupted. Perhaps the only way to expose and reform this systemic disaster would be a class action by teachers &/or parents & students against all of us who have been complicit in these myriad layers of self-interest actions bordering on malpractice.
Since the likelihood of legal action is a remote it would be wonderfully unprecedented for a leveraged agency, such as the US Department of Education to hold a convention of the nation’s leading educators to consider and ideally endorse a covenant of principles and more importantly prescriptive practices ideally on a website that transparently allows these to be challenged, tweaked and further specified for different age-grade-situational conditions. Additionally, such a rolling convention also could address differentiated staffing based on what schools are expected to do, and with a differentiated set of Best Practices for each function, like doctors and nurses, attorneys and paralegals, etc. Schools are expected to carry-on three essential although overlapping functions: 1. Teach new concepts, content and a positive disposition toward self-directed learning; 2. Provide assessment and supervised practice in these objectives; and, 3. Operate a massive custodial role that keeps students in school for at least seven-nine hours a day for about 200 days a year for about 13 years, and now through at least 2 more years of college. Our labor market and economic system depend on schools to meet these criteria at the very least. The problem is not the expectations, but that staffing, and organization do not reflect these three societal essentials. And, sadly there is no free market in which to buy the best ideas and practices. But, this is another complex issue requiring several additional paragraphs that would not begin and end with vouchers and charter schools.
Meanwhile, please consider joining the websites below offering a potentially startup means of getting the current system moving in the right direction for all who would teach. As an aside, taxpayers would be grateful since increasing classroom effectiveness and adding differentiated staffing could bring about efficiencies that could save billions of dollars with even the smallest degree of adoption.
Anthony V. Manzo, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus,
University of Missouri-KC