Measurement & Evaluation
The Unintended Consequences of Data Standardization
Building a more equitable, effective, and efficient social sector will require understanding and addressing these risks.
Building a more equitable, effective, and efficient social sector will require understanding and addressing these risks.
Measuring how long impact lasts can be difficult, but nonprofits and donors should make the effort.
Funders may be reluctant to support narrative work because progress is difficult to evaluate. Are these objections valid?
To be successful, impact investors need more realistic expectations and to be part of a larger and community-based pool of capital, including philanthropic investments that lays the groundwork for impact.
Many argue that the social sector lacks data due to capacity, technology, and funding constraints. But what if there’s something more systemic going on?
When funders aren’t accountable for impact, it ruins the party for everyone.
Impact investors and grant makers can learn from each other.
Imagine if nonprofit leaders, philanthropists, and policy makers no longer had to guess what works but could predict success with scientific certainty. Enter the field of impact science.
Wouldn’t it be great if you could simply report your program results and get them externally verified by a trusted third-party registry? It’s not as impossible as it sounds—in fact, we’re close.
For NGOs, impact comes in different forms and to track the cycles of social change work, we must think across the tangibility and the speed of emergence of change.