Seven Deadly Sins of Impact Evaluation
Seven obstacles to making good decisions about impact evaluations and how to avoid them.
Seven obstacles to making good decisions about impact evaluations and how to avoid them.
The outgoing president of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation reflects on the importance of strategic philanthropy.
For “scaling what works” to actually work, we need a new and improved version that addresses two fundamental constraints.
We must use our scarce resources to serve disenfranchised people’s needs and demand that evidence of results play a greater role in funding decisions.
The biggest social wins will come from a shift in mind-set that refocuses efforts on improving organizational effectiveness.
Funders are calling for more program evaluation, but nonprofits are often collecting dubious data, at great cost to themselves and ultimately to the people they serve.
With an understanding of these 10 funding models, nonprofit leaders can use the for-profit world's valuable practice of engaging in succinct and clear conversations about long-term financial strategy.
Conventional wisdom says that scaling social innovation starts with strengthening internal management capabilities. This study of 12 high-impact nonprofits, however, shows that real social change happens when organizations go outside their own walls and find creative ways to enlist the help of others.
Too many people believe social value is objective, fixed, and stable, when in fact it is subjective, malleable, and variable.
In an era of declining resources, nonprofits need to clarify their intended impact.