The Research Gap in Social Entrepreneurship
A literature review of research on social entrepreneurship reveals that academics and practitioners seem to be operating in separate spheres. A look at why this is happening and what to do about it.
Innovative ways organizations can work together to increase their overall reach and efficacy (more)
A literature review of research on social entrepreneurship reveals that academics and practitioners seem to be operating in separate spheres. A look at why this is happening and what to do about it.
In and around Pittsburgh, a cross-sector network sponsors approaches to education that blend technology and peer-to-peer collaboration.
People who rise within a hierarchy often develop qualities that make it hard for them work together in groups.
How World Wildlife Fund helped organize a global clarion call to stop wildlife crime.
New research helps put collective impact in historical context and offers perspective on the challenge of sustainability.
In an industry where the “publish or perish” mentality is strongly engrained, collaboration is gaining traction and leading to better patient outcomes.
By using a dynamic framework for authentic collaboration, we can increase the potential for problem-solving and create long-term, societal level change.
Funders serving as central node for a cross-sector, collaborative network have unique advantages for success in an advocacy environment.
Academic-humanitarian collaborations that mobilize rigorous scientific research can improve the effectiveness of aid efforts.
Digital projects aimed at helping refugees need to consolidate their efforts and work collectively.