Reconsidering Evidence: What It Means and How We Use It
The tide that has swept experimental program evaluation to the forefront of knowledge building about social policy is suddenly ebbing.
Innovative public sector policies and programs (more)
The tide that has swept experimental program evaluation to the forefront of knowledge building about social policy is suddenly ebbing.
The financial lives of Americans have dramatically changed. The programs, policies, and products designed to help them need to change too.
We can drive more capital to community-driven solutions that deliver results, but first we need a change in mindset—one that focuses on outcomes—using data and partnerships.
Two federal agencies have removed barriers that have discouraged foundations and pension funds from seeking out impact investments.
If we’re going to help poor families gain agency, dignity, and mobility, we need poverty measurements that point the way to a decent standard of living.
We need a more systemic and accessible way for underserved individuals to share their beliefs, insights, and experiences directly with policymakers, nonprofits, and their own communities.
A view from the field reveals optimism and ideas for building a better society.
Unless we prioritize government collection, analysis, and distribution of data, public officials will continue to make decisions with limited facts, and citizens will get poorer services from the government than from the private sector.
Much of the international development community remains stuck in its old ways, focused on short time horizons, rigid planning, and unproductive evaluation.
Inclusive governance will require that civil society, government, and industry work together to empower citizens.