Mind the Gap
Stronger ties between academic evaluators and social innovators would hugely benefit both sides.
New ways to measure and evaluate the impact an organization’s work has on society (more)
Stronger ties between academic evaluators and social innovators would hugely benefit both sides.
The views of those who benefit from social programs offer insight into a program’s effectiveness.
Grantmakers can use a quantitative framework to help them decide which advocacy programs to invest in, and advocacy organizations can use it to determine which approaches might be most effective.
Donors want their money to be spent wisely, but knowing where to give can be difficult.
Many programs targeting low-performing students rely on data that doesn’t indicate a real understanding of impact on students’ lives.
It is important to remember that while all this studying is great, innovators should place a higher priority on helping people when some program or product is effective.
Who is the target population for a microcredit intervention? Your answer will depend largely on where you sit: Academics and microfinance institutions will be interested in different groups of people.
It is perhaps no coincidence that the development community’s biggest successes—eradication initiatives like polio and smallpox—are precisely the ones that made monitoring central to their work.
Data scientists and information economists are beginning to pair with social innovators to understand the dynamics of interventions and to separate what works from what doesn’t.
Five measurement practices that Obama’s campaign and high-performing nonprofits have in common.