Impact Market Failure
It comes down to this: We’re all operating in a dysfunctional market for impact.
It comes down to this: We’re all operating in a dysfunctional market for impact.
Response to the fact that a majority of surveyed funders devoted 10 percent or less to tech-related grants and activities.
I believe that there are three core approaches to philanthropy, each of which can be effective.
There should be greater concern over who is protecting nonprofits that find themselves in situations like that of NPR, which recently lost its federal funding.
The work of charities in almost all circumstances requires focused effort over a substantial period of time.
Funders are calling for more program evaluation, but nonprofits are often collecting dubious data, at great cost to themselves and ultimately to the people they serve.
With an understanding of these 10 funding models, nonprofit leaders can use the for-profit world's valuable practice of engaging in succinct and clear conversations about long-term financial strategy.
Our understanding of community can help funders and evaluators identify, understand, and strengthen the communities they work with.
Impact evaluations are an important tool for learning about effective solutions to social problems, but they are a good investment only in the right circumstances.
The superficially enticing “logic” of effective altruism ultimately leads to a moralistic, hyper-rationalistic, top-down approach to philanthropy that can kill the very altruistic spirit it claims to foster.