ESG Is Not Impact Investing and Impact Investing Is Not ESG
Understanding these six important differences will both facilitate better conversations and help channel funds appropriately.
New ways to measure and evaluate the impact an organization’s work has on society (more)
Understanding these six important differences will both facilitate better conversations and help channel funds appropriately.
Imagine if nonprofit leaders, philanthropists, and policy makers no longer had to guess what works but could predict success with scientific certainty. Enter the field of impact science.
As a cross-sector collaboration, ESG means different things to different people, but systems change will require building a shared understanding between diverse stakeholders.
A recent study shows that comparable, easily digestible metrics shifted donations from charities with only a good pitch to those with demonstrable results.
Wouldn’t it be great if you could simply report your program results and get them externally verified by a trusted third-party registry? It’s not as impossible as it sounds—in fact, we’re close.
Before we rush back into large in-person gatherings, we should strategize about how we can make them more impactful.
By adopting tools from Bayesian rationalist analysis, social justice philanthropy can become more ambitious and impactful.
For NGOs, impact comes in different forms and to track the cycles of social change work, we must think across the tangibility and the speed of emergence of change.
New evidence shows that the very act of giving feedback on nonprofit programs can predict participant outcomes.
Hiring managers focus on qualities they deem relevant to the job, even if applying those qualities may be discriminatory.