Practitioners in the field of humanitarian aid increasingly acknowledge that conventional approaches to conflict intervention have not produced satisfactory results—despite, in some cases, the expenditure of vast sums of money. There are numerous reasons for this failure, but the most salient one is that programs that rely on grand planning and rigid implementation work only under very specific conditions, almost none of which apply to conflict zones. By definition, conflict intervention...
Want more? Sorry, the full text of this article is only available to subscribers. Subscribe now.
Already a subscriber? Please log in by entering your email address and password into the red login box at the top-right corner of this page.
Need to register for your premium online access, which is included with your paid subscription? Register here.